In this two-part investigation, “The Moving Border,” Latino USA delves into the increasing pressure put on refugees seeking safety in the United States via its southern border. It reveals the surprising support the Trump administration has received from a Mexican administration that once publicly spoke out against Trump’s rhetoric, and how together they’ve created an impenetrable policy wall that pushes asylum seekers further and further south.
During his presidential campaign, Donald Trump centered much of his messaging on the idea of building a wall between the U.S. and Mexico. It was an idea that seemed at total odds with a country whose public persona spoke proudly about being a nation of immigrants. And while his chant of “build the wall” became a rallying point for a demographic of voters, it also seemed extremely unlikely to ever happen. It was expensive and too simple of an idea to actually be effective in dealing with a complex issue.
In the end, the physical wall that President Trump has been able to build over the last three and a half years is fairly limited. The headlines since he took office have instead been filled with news of nearly constant policy and legal shifts by the administration to frustrate —and potentially almost completely stifle— many forms of immigration.
One group targeted by this avalanche of policy changes has been asylum seekers. These are people who are traditionally the most vulnerable, including those seeking safety from violence and persecution in their home countries. The U.S. had historically been one of the countries who took in the most refugees each year. Under President Obama, the U.S. said it was willing to take in 110,000 refugees a year. President Trump cut that to just 18,000 for fiscal year 2020—one of the lowest in modern times.
These cuts come at a time when U.S. regional neighbors in Central and South America have seen profound political and economic unrest—as have many parts of the world.
Despite international criticism for this action, the Trump administration went further. It also tore into the process for reviewing asylum claims, particularly from those who present themselves at the U.S. southern border. While in the past asylum seekers had been allowed to wait in the U.S. as the years-long process unfolded, Trump deployed new policies that left more than 60,000 asylum seekers, many of them children, languishing in Mexican border towns indefinitely as they wait for decisions on their claims.
In episode one, “The North,” we visit the Mexican city of Ciudad Juárez, where we tell the story of a mother and daughter who have been mired in a web of changing policy and subjected to ongoing violence. And we find concrete evidence of how Mexican authorities are working hand-in-hand with the U.S. at the border.
With encouragement and financial assistance, Mexico has been building itself up as more than a place asylum seekers transit through on the way to the U.S.—it wants to be a “destination” for asylum seekers itself. Last year, more than 70,000 asylum petitions were filed, double the amount from the year prior. International refugee advocates say Mexico is struggling to actually provide a safe haven for these vulnerable migrants, many of whom are applying not because they feel any safer in Mexico, but because they see no viable way to reach the northern border. And they say the U.S. has followed a global trend of wealthier countries pursuing —and paying for— policies of “externalization” that push migrants into poorer and less safe countries, rather than hosting refugees themselves.
In episode two, “The South,” we visit Tapachula, a Mexican city on the border with Guatemala that has become a frontier for this trend and is overwhelmed by desperate migrants arriving from across the globe. We go in search of one young man from Honduras who has been caught in this shifting border as he tries, over and over, to make it to the U.S. And we learn just how devastating this policy can be for someone whose life is in constant risk.